Gain Notes for Revolution 1406 This is one of the later revolutions in the mission where the calibration sources have become so weak that for the best energy determination and IC Gain History table is needed. NB This revolution was subject to strong gain suppression due to solar activity during the middle of the revolution. This means that despite careful correction for the suppression to produce good event-by-event gain determination, that spectra may look odd since the low gain will have lost many low energy events to the onboard low end rejection. To get optimal results with this revolution it is necessary to use the IC gain history table that has been created offline at DNSC, instead of the gain history table created automatically by OSA. If you have the newest package of IC files from ISDC and these are correctly installed, OSA will find the IC gain history table automatically and you don't need to do anything else. The updated ISDC Instrument Characteristics can be downloaded from http://www.isdc.unige.ch/integral/download/osa_sw However, if you don't have the IC gain table package from ISDC you can download the table from the gain history archive by anonymous ftp through the link provided. Download the table to some suitable subdirectory for your analysis, then set the hidden OSA parameter gainHist: gainHist="/". These files are used instead of the automatically generated gain history tables wherever there has been an unusual or non-linear behaviour of the detector gain. JEM-X1: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows good gain correction with all SCWs, except the very first science windows, having a Xe level within 3-4% of the ideal. This is actually a fantastic result given the enormous gain suppression in the middle of the revolution As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. Calibration source number 4 (purple/orange) is no longer used for calibration purposes since an anode strip directly under the source has broken and no useable signal comes from this area of the detector any longer. CAO 26/5/2014 JEM-X2: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows good gain correction with all science windows having a Xe level within 3-4% of the ideal. As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. The same comments apply as for JEM-X1. Despite the IC tables correcting for the strong gain suppression in a purely event-by-event energy correction, there will be unusual loss of real events to the low energy discriminator that usually filters out perticle events, but will have taken many fo the low energy x-ray events. This means that spectral will be unreliable, especially at the low energies. Note that calibration source 4 is no longer used for this unit. CAO 2/6/2014