Gain Notes for Revolution 1389 This is one of the later revolutions in the mission where the calibration sources have become so weak that for the best energy determination and IC Gain History table is needed. NB!!!!!!!! This revolution is strongly affected by solar activity, causing the instruments to be shut off for much of the revolution. For JEM-X1 it was not possible to do a good gain correction because of non-linear gain suppression which caused the Xe line to be far too high (30.7 keV) while the Cu line appears far too low (7.3 keV) for this reason a Bad Time Interval (BTI) has been declared for JEM-X for the entire revolution BIT = 5170.5 to 5173.5 IJD. This is a Bad Response BTI, and it can be overruled by a user GTI, but should only be done by expert users. This data should never be used for energy-sensitive or spectral purposes. To get optimal results with this revolution it is necessary to use the IC gain history table that has been created offline at DNSC, instead of the gain history table created automatically by OSA. If you have the newest package of IC files from ISDC and these are correctly installed, OSA will find the IC gain history table automatically and you don't need to do anything else. The updated ISDC Instrument Characteristics can be downloaded from http://www.isdc.unige.ch/integral/download/osa_sw However, if you don't have the IC gain table package from ISDC you can download the table from the gain history archive by anonymous ftp through the link provided. Download the table to some suitable subdirectory for your analysis, then set the hidden OSA parameter gainHist: gainHist="/". These files are used instead of the automatically generated gain history tables wherever there has been an unusual or non-linear behaviour of the detector gain. JEM-X1: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows apalling gain correction for which a BTI (5170.5 to 5173.5 IJD) has been declared. Do not use this data for scientific purposes unless you really know what you're doing. Or contact the instrument team: oxborrow "at"space.dtu.dk. JEM-X2: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows very gain correction with all except the very first and last science windows having a Xe level within 2-3% of the ideal. As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. CAO 24/03/2014