Gain Notes for Revolution 1136 This is one of the later revolutions in the mission where the calibration sources have become so weak that for the best energy determination and IC Gain History table is needed. To get optimal results with this revolution it is necessary to use the IC gain history table that has been created offline at DNSC, instead of the gain history table created automatically by OSA. If you have the newest package of IC files from ISDC and these are correctly installed, OSA will find the IC gain history table automatically and you don't need to do anything else. The updated ISDC Instrument Characteristics can be downloaded from http://www.isdc.unige.ch/integral/download/osa_sw However, if you don't have the IC gain table package from ISDC you can download the table from the gain history archive by anonymous ftp through the link provided. Download the table to some suitable subdirectory for your analysis, then set the hidden OSA parameter gainHist: gainHist="/". These files are used instead of the automatically generated gain history tables wherever there has been an unusual or non-linear behaviour of the detector gain. JEM-X1: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows very good gain correction for all science windows with a Xe signal strong enough to be fitted (poorly fitted SCWs are those with a width outside the range 1.5 to 3.5). All the well-fitted Xe lines have a Xe level within 2-3% of the ideal. Despite a good fit to the strong peak in hardware triggers, it is not possible to determine the Xe line position in this peak since the grey filter has kicked in and removed many of the Xe photons from the telemetry chain, making it impossible to fit reliable line positions to SCWs in this time range. As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. Calibration source number 4 (purple/orange) is no longer used for calibration purposes since an anode strip directly under the source has broken and no useable signal comes from this area of the detector any longer. JEM-X2: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows excellent gain correction with all science windows having a Xe level within 2% of the ideal. As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. NB: Despite the gain dip seen in JEM-X1 due to the peak in trigger rate JEM-X2 shows no such behaviour at all, and the gain smoothing for the IC table has actually been done without any trigger dependence. CAO 1/03/2012