
	SDAST CHAT # 49: THURSDAY 4TH OCTOBER 2001
	
PARTICIPANTS: Peter Kretschmar, Carol Anne Oxborrow, Niels Joergen Westergaard

SUBJECTS DISCUSSED:
	Agenda for SDAST meeting 9-10th October 2001
	Missing items for V2 integration
	AI list

ACTION ITEMS:
	None

**** Logging Started : Thu Oct 04 09:27:26 MEST 2001
<peter> Good Morning Carol Anne!
> Hi Peter - Stefan won't be joining us END
<peter> Yeah, I just found an email from him.
> Let's hope that Sami and NJW turn up - or it'll just be us two, which would
> be rather pointless given the number of emails we exchange. END
<peter> Yes, I agree. And it's not that we haven't had the chance to talk recently :-) END
<peter> Will you look for Niels Jrgen? I could try to call Sami. END
*** njw (~njw@uhuru.dsri.dk) has joined channel #jemxadr
> NJW should be with us soon! END
* njw Hi, sorry I'm late, just caught by something else END
<peter> Sami does not answer his phone .... He's probably still underway. END
> Okay, let's get going, I've got an executable to get out the door.
> Point one: Next week's agenda. 
> First, Stefan has to leave at 16.00 to get the train back to Stockholm, so
> that might mean cutting down abit on Wednesday afternoon. Anything else that
> needs to be on the agenda? END
<peter> At least at the moment it looks complete to me. END
> Okay, then I'll just jiggle things around a bit to accomodate Stefan's train
> times. Also the supper will be at 20.00 because I have an appointment with
> Andreas' schoolteacher that evening. I'll be booking a table for  4 at a
> very nice italian restaurant close to the school. Is that alright with you? 
> END
<peter> OK, Is 4 enough? (you, Sami, NJW, Stefan, me)
<peter> END
<njw> Sorry, my son's birthday, I have a party at home END
> NJW, NL, AH and SB are all unavailable, so it'll be just a select little
> group at Fiasco. END
> Next on agenda: Peter could you give us a rundown on things that are still
<peter> OK.
> missing for V2 integration? END
<peter> Currently the only one, where I have noted that the interface still needs update is j_ima_cor_intensity.
<peter> And j_bkg_scal_calc may still need an update because of changed bkg model templates. 
<njw> There's a good chance that I can redeliver ..cor_intensity this month END
<peter> j_src_spectra has the current interface, but trips over some test data, since Stefan has not caught the case "no spectra to be produced". END
<peter> to NJW: That would be good. END
> Is that everything Peter? It sounds like we're doing not too badly. END
<peter> Yes. The problem is not the state we're in, it's just that we should have been there 2 months ago :-). But that's history ... END
> Next point: the new unit testing standards. I may have implemented these
> a little hastily. I appreciate that not everyone has fdiff etc. and that
> a separate target is needed in makeisdc1.in, the question is: what should
> that target be called `dircmp' `Dircmp' `DirCmp', or what? I'll use it
> for the delivery of j_prp_verify as soon as I know the standard name for
> the new target. END
<peter> Please read Appendix E of the freshly updated Coding & Testing Standards document and follow the
<peter> advice there to the letter. You should not need to set up any new targets yourself, configure will do this for you.
> I thought I did ENd
<peter> I must admit though, that I have not tried this myself yet. END
<peter> Your problems usually come from (a) David overzealously applying rules without yet having adapted tools,
<peter> (b) you trying to do stuff 'manually' that ISDC want's to do automatically, e.g. putting your own targets in the makefile.
<peter> END
> No, this target has been suggested to me in emails from ISDC, but it
> wasn't clear what the standared name was yesterday - I just wanted to
> check it first. I do not put my own targets in - I only do what I'm told.
> I'll ask Mark. END
> Okay, AI list: what's been done that's still hanging around on the list?END
<njw> Looking at the AIList from Sept 6, 2001 I still have some actions
<njw> I believe that AI19_1 can be closed (DETE-MOD structure)
<njw> I guess that Sami has got the roll angle calculation AI19_16, else he will
<njw> get one on tuesday. END
> Okay, 19_1 is off the list. Any other  business? END
<peter> Mine are still open, I've started on some but no results yet. END
> If there's no more to discuss: We you on Tuesday! END
> Have a good weekend. END
> `See you on Tuesday'! END
